

MLA
Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary
Barmer Constituency · Barmer, Rajasthan
INDMember, Rajasthan Legislative Assembly
- State: Rajasthan
- District: Barmer
- Position: MLA
- Party: IND
- Gender: Female
- Profession: Pension, Agriculture and Petrol Pump Rent
Neta Trust Score
No ratings yet
Be the first to share your experience
Your voice counts
How has Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary served Barmer?
Slide once for your overall view. You can adjust 10 factors on the next screen. It takes about a minute. Be the first citizen to share a rating.
Overall
—/10
Slide to choose
This slider is 1–10. The Neta Trust Score adds all ten factors into one total out of 100.
Contact
Contact details for this representative — not NetaSampark support.
Profile
About
Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary is the Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) for Barmer in Rajasthan, an Independent. She won the seat in the 2023 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election with 1,06,948 votes. Check her verified record below and rate her performance on NetaSampark.
Who is Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary?
Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary represents the Barmer Assembly constituency in the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly as an Independent. She was elected in the 2023 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election (results declared ).
Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary's assets and affidavit
As declared in her 2023 election affidavit (compiled by ADR/MyNeta):
- Total assets: Rs 3,71,94,481 (about Rs 3.7 crore)
- Total liabilities: Nil
- Criminal cases declared: 0
These figures are self-declared and reflect the position at the time of filing.
- State
- Rajasthan
- District
- Barmer
- Position
- MLA
- Party
- IND
- Gender
- Female
- Profession
- Pension, Agriculture and Petrol Pump Rent
- Education
- Post Graduate
- Membership
- Sitting
2024
Election result
- Votes
- 1,06,948
- Vote share
- 49.66%
- Margin
- 13,337
- Runner-up
- Mewaram Jain (INC), 93,611 votes (2023)
- Assets declared
- Rs 3,71,94,481 (as declared in 2023 affidavit)
- Liabilities declared
- Nil (as declared in 2023 affidavit)
- Criminal cases declared
- 0 (as declared in 2023 affidavit)
Questions
Common questions
Who is the MLA of Barmer?
Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary is the Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) for Barmer in Rajasthan, an Independent. She won the seat in the 2023 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election with 1,06,948 votes.
Which party does Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary belong to?
She belongs to the Independent (IND).
How many votes did Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary get in 2023?
She received 1,06,948 votes (49.66% of valid votes) and won by 13,337 votes over Mewaram Jain (INC), per ECI.
What is Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary's educational qualification?
Post Graduate – M.A. in 1996 from Rajasthan University B.D.S From Rajasthan University 2005, as declared in the 2023 affidavit.
What assets has Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary declared?
In her 2023 election affidavit she declared total assets of Rs 3,71,94,481 (about Rs 3.7 crore) and liabilities of nil.
How can I contact Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary?
Sign in to view contact details.
How can I rate Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary?
Open her NetaSampark profile, select 'Rate Dr. Priyanka Chowdhary' and score her on 10 factors such as accessibility, responsiveness and development work. Your rating counts towards her Neta Trust Score.
How is the Neta Trust Score calculated?
The Neta Trust Score is a score out of 100 built from citizen ratings on NetaSampark across 10 factors: leadership, transparency, accessibility, communication, responsiveness, development work, integrity & ethics, public engagement, citizen confidence and problem resolution. It reflects user opinions and is not an official government rating.
Timeline
Political career
Elected MLA from Barmer, Rajasthan Legislative Assembly general election – IND, 1,06,948 votes (49.66%), margin 13,337 over Mewaram Jain (INC) ECI
Sources & last updated
Directory facts on this page are compiled from public datasets published on data.gov.in (NDSAP) and the Election Commission of India. Citizen ratings and edits are moderated on NetaSampark.
Profile last updated .
How the Neta Trust Score is calculated · Editorial neutrality