Ex-MLA
Gias Uddin Molla
Magrahat Paschim Constituency · South 24 Parganas, West Bengal
AITCMember, West Bengal Legislative Assembly
- State: West Bengal
- District: South 24 Parganas
- Position: Ex-MLA
- Party: AITC
- Age: 38
- Profession: Government Aided Service as Junior Assistant at Diamond Hrbour Womens University (category UR)
Neta Trust Score
No ratings yet
Be the first to share your experience
Your voice counts
How has Gias Uddin Molla served Magrahat Paschim?
Slide once for your overall view. You can adjust 10 factors on the next screen. It takes about a minute. Be the first citizen to share a rating.
Overall
—/10
Slide to choose
This slider is 1–10. The Neta Trust Score adds all ten factors into one total out of 100.
Contact
Contact details for this representative — not NetaSampark support.
No phone or email listed yet.
Profile
About
Gias Uddin Molla is a former Member of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly (MLA). Gias Uddin Molla represented Magrahat Paschim in the 17th West Bengal Legislative Assembly (2021–2026) and was listed as a member of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) in the official West Bengal Legislative Assembly members handbook (corrected up to ). Gias Uddin Molla was not a candidate in Magrahat Paschim in the 2026 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election; the seat was won by Md. Samim Ahamed Molla (AITC), per the Election Commission of India. Source: Election Commission of India and the official West Bengal Legislative Assembly website. Last verified: .
- State
- West Bengal
- District
- South 24 Parganas
- Position
- Ex-MLA
- Party
- AITC
- Age
- 38
- Profession
- Government Aided Service as Junior Assistant at Diamond Hrbour Womens University (category UR)
- Education
- Post Graduate
- Membership
- Former
Sources & last updated
Directory facts on this page are compiled from public datasets published on data.gov.in (NDSAP) and the Election Commission of India. Citizen ratings and edits are moderated on NetaSampark.
Profile last updated .
How the Neta Trust Score is calculated · Editorial neutrality